Advocacy Through Multiple Perspectives, An Interview with Elesia Ashkenazy
Published January 25, 2009 @ 11:23AM PT
There are so many different perspectives on autism and disability: perspectives from self advocates, from parents, from service providers and therapists, perspectives both from deep within the larger disability rights movement and without. The perspective of people who were born with their disabilities and the perspective of people who acquired their disabilities later in life. While people with different perspectives often disagree (sometimes violently) with each other, I also feel there is much to be learned from considering and integrating multiple perspectives (blame this on my systems science Interest!).
Autism cause member Elesia Ashkenazy is a person who has many those perspectives at once. She's always been an Aspergers' autistic, and also went from having a usable amount of hearing to being profoundly deaf. She has been a professional in the speech language pathology field, and is the parent of an autistic child. She has been involved in both the Deaf and Autistic culture movements. Since it's hard to get people from all those perspectives to agree on much of anything, I was curious what the experience of having all these perspectives (particularly the cross-disability perspectives) at once may have taught Elesia about disability and advocacy.
Dora: You've been able to view disability from a lot of different perspectives. What is the most important insight you feel you've gained from experiencing disability in so many different ways?
Elesia: The most important insight I have gained about disability through my experiences would fall right in line with a Kim Peek quote, which goes: You don't have to be disabled to be different because everybody is different. I have also come to feel that being disabled is more about being mismatched with the environment rather than being "broken" or "afflicted." It is not until I learned that life is not always about labels--though labels definitely have a time and a place--but more about learning to love myself for who I am. It was from that idea that I was able to choose to live life, which has now become a game that I am playing; only I am the director.
Dora: You were active in the Deaf community before you became involved with the Autistic community. What knowledge or skills gained from being an advocate in the Deaf community have you found most applicable to being an advocate in the Autistic community (both as a self-advocate and as an advocate for your child)?
Elesia: Cliché as this may be, I suppose that I have learned that it really is best to catch flies with a little honey. I completely understand taking a militant stance. I mean, enough is enough. There is, however, great value in putting out positive proactive messages and sticking to the bottom line without using negative tactics. I have never fought for Deaf or Autistic rights, per say, but I have stood my ground armed with peace and love. Sharing ideas and beliefs keeps the world turning. On the other hand, precious energy is wasted when power is given to ongoing disagreements. A message is most effective when simply stated and then lived.
Dora: What thing or things do you feel are the most similar between the Deaf and Autistic communities?
Elesia: Compassion and understanding along with sharing a common culture. Our autism brings us together in the same way that deafness binds the Deaf community. There is what I call "special homing chemicals" between those who fall from the same tree.
Dora: What thing or things do you feel are the most the different between the Deaf and Autistic communities?
Elesia: Obviously, autistics do not share a language specific to the community. It also comes to mind that the Autistic community is much newer and lacks the rich history of the Deaf community. For too long, autistics have been robbed of having a voice. It is as if we are greenhorns as far as building a community and expressing a culture. It pleases me how successful we have become thus far.
Dora: Some self-advocates might claim that you've adopted a cure rather than acceptance stance by getting a cochlear implant. Would you agree or disagree? Could you talk a little about why you decided to get the cochlear implant, and how you feel your decision fits in (or not) with the complex issue of "cure?"
Elesia: Cochlear implants are not a cure for deafness. That is a myth. Cochlear implants are an assistive device. I can choose when I do and do not want to use my cochlear implant. I would not have gone through with the surgery if I were not able to have this control. Cochlear implants are an individual choice. Forcing cochlear implants on every deaf child or person is, in and of itself, proposing that one shoe fits all. As far as the complex "cure" issue, let me put it this way. I used to live my life practically killing myself to please anyone and everyone. Guess what? I had no true friends.
Dora: What do you feel is the most important thing the Autistic community can learn from the Deaf community?
Elesia: How empowering and meaningful it is to be a part of a positive (or posautive) thriving close knit community regardless of antagonistic societal fears or disapproval.
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
Monday Autism News Potpourri
-
Demanding NO Reduction in Services
-
Shift for Students from High School to College
Comments (10)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email


















Thanks for this interview. This makes me think we really need to do more to join hands with the Deaf Community.
Once when I was at an animal place in a booth for Animal Aid, I met the lady in the booth next to me who was a service dogs for the deaf educator. She said that I needed to know that sometimes when my daughter threw herself on the floor in crying frustration with a complete meltdown, it was likely that it was caused by her inability to communicate, not by her autism. She said that she'd been around enough deaf people who had meltdowns like that which made some people think that they were autistic.
Posted by B B on 01/25/2009 @ 11:35AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Hi Becky, I have several deaf friends and have always been struck by the similarities between them and me as well--everything from (oh yes) meltdowns from communication frustration, to what accommodations help us best, to even the problem of people thinking we're cold and unfeeling simply because we don't always respond when someone calls our name, or thinking we're stupid because we don't speak "properly" (or at all).
Posted by Dora Raymaker on 01/25/2009 @ 11:55AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Great interview, thank you for sharing it here!
Posted by Karen D on 01/25/2009 @ 02:11PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
This was a fascinating and well-written interview (except for the misspelling of "per se").
One of my interests is the depiction of individuals with disabilities in popular media. I would love to see a cross-disability organization that advocated for positive portrayals in movies, television shows, etc., and applauded creators who got them right. As Ms. Ashkenazy says above, it can be very effective to make change by using "a little honey", by rewarding instead of criticizing.
GLAAD, the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, has been doing this kind of work for many years. I would love to see GLAAD used as a model for a disability-media-advocacy group. http://www.glaad.org/about/index.php
Posted by R K on 01/25/2009 @ 04:32PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Regarding consulting for movies and shows, what about http://disabilityworks.com/index.html ? Thanks for the GLAAD link!
Posted by Dora Raymaker on 01/25/2009 @ 04:39PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I was not familiar with Disability Works, so thank you for the link. It's great that someone is offering consulting services, and script review and casting help--all of that could have positive results, and I'll have to read the web pages in more detail when I have time.
However, I envision (or hope for) an organization with broader scope, a lot more clout, and one that is much more proactive, like GLAAD. It seems that Disability Works needs to wait for producers to come to them and ask for their services. I hope to see a media "watchdog" organization, like GLAAD that points out the many offensive stereotypes in popular media (so, no, it's not all about "the honey"). However, I think the awards that GLAAD gives are also a very effective part of their mission. Those awards are now a pretty big deal (broadcast nationally on Bravo).
Posted by R K on 01/25/2009 @ 04:54PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Yes, GLAAD is way broader and more proactive. I'm going to do some serious study of their site and their work! I'm a huge fan of seeing how other organizations are succeeding at things and then using those same strategies :-)
Posted by Dora Raymaker on 01/25/2009 @ 05:09PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Great interview thanks and I so agree with the quote: "You don't have to be disabled to be different because everybody is different." I see myself as differently able as everyone has there strengths and weaknesses, my biggest journey has been to find self after a life time of being misunderstood and not even understanding myself. I guess I am lucky that there is now an ever growing aspie /autie community who have made a huge difference to me.
I think the difference with groups like glaad they have quite a few celebrities who are happy to stand up and speak out on there behalf... very few do that in the asd world, and there still is huge gaps in real awareness and understanding world wide...
Posted by Alyson Bradley on 01/25/2009 @ 10:01PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I'm glad this interview was enjoyable to several readers. It's hard to come forward and speak out about hot topics. Acceptance is a lovely plus. Thank you readers! And thank you Dora!
Posted by Elesia Ashkenazy on 01/26/2009 @ 09:28PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Dora and Elesia, thank you for doing this interview!
I've long thought (see http://www.autistics.org/library/allies.html) that the autistic community has much to learn from both the Deaf and gay communities.
I think that public discourse and policymaking about autism should be guided by the social model of disability, not just by the medical model of disability (which is currently overwhelmingly the case). The Deaf community has shown the way to put that into practice, by making commonplace a number of everyday accommodations that enable Deaf people to live capably in an overwhelmingly hearing world *as Deaf people*.
The gay community has shown the way to change societal attitudes in at least two ways: ally outreach and focus on changing organizational cultures. Effective ally outreach has leveraged strength-in-numbers far beyond the percentage of the population that is LGBT itself. Likewise, success in changing the organizational culture of schools, employers, etc. to remove barriers and intolerance has leveraged the power of those organizations to change individuals' attitudes and behavior.
So I think it's intriguing to see the references to GLAAD here too -- thanks to the contributors of them as well!
I think what Elesia said about "a little honey" is really really important. Often what we need to do is to speak *over the heads of the noisy few who are antagonistic towards us*, to the vast less-rigidly-thinking majority beyond, whose minds might be more open than we might sometimes think, and whose innate sense of fairmindedness we might sometimes underestimate.
I also think that what Elesia said about cochlear implants is really really important. She said, simply and clearly, that they are an assistive device, not a cure.
By saying that, she blew away the false dichotomy played up in the media over cochlear implants. It isn't either-or. You don't instantaneously lose fluency or comprehension of sign by getting an implant. Children who get implants can, and to my mind *must*, still be taught sign and be helped to develop connections with the Deaf community even as they navigate a hearing world. Deaf culture and sign language are not going to wither because of the availability of cochlear implants.
The social and political history of autism is *littered* with similar false dichotomies. Because of the power imbalance in autism politics -- with most of the mindshare and money and policymaking clout going to the *autism community*, that is, nonautistic parents and professionals and their agendas (a political landscape which could be captioned "All our base are belong to them") -- the *autistic community* has been subjected to 60 years of fads, false prophets, and neglect of issues that actually impact daily living and quality of life.
Mitigation of handicap and embrace of difference are not mutually exclusive, are not an either-or choice, in autism, either. For example, just because I think the onus is on society to accept hand-flapping does not mean therefore that I must be against giving legitimate medical attention to gastrointestinal distress.
As a community, we folks on the autism spectrum really do need both the community-building and promotion of widespread everyday accommodations that the Deaf community has been so good at for so many decades, and the public relations and outreach expertise that GLAAD, PFLAG, Out and Equal Workplace, and other gay community organizations are so good at.
Posted by Phil Schwarz on 02/14/2009 @ 09:16PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.