Autism

Autism Genetics and Gender

Published May 20, 2009 @ 02:24PM PT

Eppendorf Tubes from Eye on DNA from http://www.eyeondna.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/eppendorftubes.jpg
I have to think back to when Charlie was in preschool to when there was a girl in his autism classroom. It's commonly stated that boys are four times more likely than girls to be on the autism spectrum, though there is some dispute about whether or not autism is underdiagnosed in girls, and if autism presents differently in women. The May 19th Time magazine reports on a Molecular Psychiatry study which describes CACNA1G, said to be an "autism-risk gene." CACNA1G is more common in boys than in girls:

CACNA1G, which sits on chromosome 17, amid other genes that have been previously linked to autism, is responsible for regulating the flow of calcium into and out of cells. Nerve cells in the brain rely on calcium to become activated, and research suggests that imbalances in the mineral can result in the overstimulation of neural connections and create developmental problems, such as autism and even epilepsy, which is also a common feature of autism. .................

"Overstimulation of neural connections"---that sounds familiar as far as extremes of experience, and also synapses and neuronal connections. Time magazine continues:

For the new study, researchers at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), combed the genetic database of the Autism Genetic Resource Exchange (AGRE), a resource of DNA from 2,000 families with at least one autistic child. The scientists focused on the more than 1,000 genetic samples of families in which at least one son was affected by the disorder, prompted by the results of an earlier study using the same database, which identified a rich autism-related genetic region on chromosome 17 that contained genetic variants more common in boys than in girls. While nearly 40% of the general population has the most common form of CACNA1G, one variant of the gene was more prevalent in autistic boys, researchers found. "There is a strong genetic signal in this region," says Dr. Daniel Geschwind, director of UCLA's Center for Autism Research and Treatment and one of the study's co-authors. "But this gene doesn't explain all of that signal or even half of it. What that means is that there are many more genes in this region contributing to autism."

Chromosome 17 has been previously noted as the site of an autism gene. With scientists identifying more genes that can be linked to autism, it's no surprise that there's been quite a bit of discussion about a prenatal test for autism and the ethical implications of this. Some years ago, a hospital in London was hoping to develop a test to screen for autism in male embryos for couples with a family history of autism; the fact that autism occurs more frequently in males than in females was noted.

All of these findings from research suggest that some kind of test could be developed before we know it and I'm for having a regular, thoughtful public discussion about these topics. They're about a huge issues that we're only beginning to articulate the implications of.

Share this Post

Related Posts

Comments (8)

  1. Ken Wickiser

    Instead of cacn being just another screen target I think that the more important results of findings like these - and keeping in mind that it's just a lead right now - is that we are slowly improving our understanding of how the brain works.

    Posted by Ken Wickiser on 05/20/2009 @ 05:10PM PT

  2. Reply to thread
  3. Maria Strong

    Some of that thoughtful discussion on radio here in Melbourne Australia recently - audio and transcript here

    http://www.abc.net.au/rn/allinthemind/stories/2009/2567806.htm

    http://www.abc.net.au/rn/healthreport/stories/2009/2557968.htm

    "All in the Mind" has a blog, with some more discussion.

    Posted by Maria Strong on 05/20/2009 @ 06:00PM PT

  4. emma brooks

    This is not a direct reply to your post but worth reading I think - I never realised the risk of amniocentesis, more testing for autism will put more pregnancies at risk. 
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2009/may/16/health-nhs

    When the research for autism genes seems so...vague (the same genetic varient occurs in 40% of the general population) any thoughts of pre-natal testing are premature. Although, before any more progress is made, now is the best time for discussion 

    Posted by emma brooks on 05/21/2009 @ 03:09AM PT

  5. Kristina Chew

    I did not think of that----and what if one did testing and everything was all right, but something happened in the process of doing the testing. Vague is the right word! 

    Posted by Kristina Chew on 05/21/2009 @ 05:42AM PT

  6. @Emma. That was a very good article in the guardian.co.uk. on the risk of amniocentesis. We do need to have a discussion about "more testing for autism will put more pregnancies at risk". I think there is truth in that last statement. It's about saving lives.

    Posted by L I on 05/21/2009 @ 10:14AM PT

  7. Phil Schwarz

    Several years back, Judy Badner of the University of Chicago's psychiatry department put together a very good position statement regarding the ethics and consequences of autism genetics research: http://psy-pc120.bsd.uchicago.edu/~jbadner/autgen.htm

    Posted by Phil Schwarz on 05/23/2009 @ 02:14PM PT

  8. Reply to thread
  9. Sam  Jones

    Eagle House Group are an independent autism school group providing quality education and care for children and young people aged 2-25 years.

    A friend of mine has a little girl who has recently joined one of their schools and she is really enjoying it there. I just wanted to let people know about what a great school network they have got. Check out their website if your interested - http://www.eaglehousegroup.co.uk/

    Posted by Sam Jones on 05/21/2009 @ 08:27AM PT

  10. One good sign of a successful school is when kids are "really enjoying it there".

    Posted by L I on 05/21/2009 @ 10:04AM PT

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Twitter Feed

Kristina Chew

Kristina is a Classics professor in Jersey City, New Jersey, a blogger (formerly at AutismVox), a translator (of Virgil), and an advocate every day for her son, Charlie.

Most Popular Autism Posts
close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.