Jonathan King Would Have Been 18 Years Old
Published July 28, 2009 @ 02:05PM PT

Jonathan King died almost 5 years ago, on November 15, 2004. He was 13 years old and this past July 13th would have been his 18th birthday.
Jonathan died at school. He hung himself with a rope that teachers had given him to hold up his pants as he habitually didn't wear a belt. The July 27th Atlanta Journal-Constitution has a long article about Jonathan and about the lack of regulation of Georgia's "psychoeducational" schools. There are 24 such facilities in Georgia and some 5,600 students in them who are "emotionally disturbed, autistic or so brain-injured that regular schools can’t control their behavior."
Jonathan was diagnosed with ADHD in kindergarden and "began a regimen of prescription medications." By sixth grade, the school district decided to place him at the Alpine School due to his being "disruptive."
Jonathan was in eighth grade in the fall of 2004. He never complained about school, his parents say, never told them anything other than he had occasionally gone to “time out.”
The Kings’ lawyers, though, eventually learned the extent of Jonathan’s understatement.
A log book for Alpine’s seclusion room showed Jonathan was confined part or all of 15 school days between August and November, sometimes twice in one day. Over two consecutive days in October, Jonathan spent 15 hours in seclusion. The first day, Jonathan ripped the hem from his shirt and wrapped it around his neck in a suicidal gesture. The next day, the log says, he was “threatening to kill himself.”
Rather than using the seclusion room only as a last resort to get the boy under control, the log suggests it became a place where teachers sometimes placed Jonathan for minor infractions. On Oct. 26, 2004, for instance, Jonathan was “cussing, argumentative and disruptive during testing; demanding water bottle be filled; swearing; [and refusing] to follow instructions,” the log says. He spent seven hours, 10 minutes in the seclusion room that day. Ten days later, on Nov. 5, Jonathan was locked up for five hours, 50 minutes after he “refused to accept feedback.”
Alpine never told Jonathan’s parents about any of the seclusions. It didn’t have to. In court papers, Alpine contends the state’s lack of regulation gave it implicit authority to use seclusion as it saw fit.
The "lack of regulation" meant that the school could just use such practices "as it saw fit," without spelling out under what circumstances Jonathan would be placed in seclusion, and without indicating an educational plan so that he would not have to be in such a place?
Jonathan's case sounds too many familiar notes to me. My son has not been placed in a timeout room, but he has been restrained in more than one New Jersey public district. The kind of "psychoeducational" facility that Jonathan died in has been suggested for my son. Certainly many things about the staffing and the training that staff receive at the schools here differs, but the use of restraints and timeout rooms are not at all unheard of.
Jonathan could talk more than my own son, and yet he was still unable to communicate what was really going on to his parents. Besides medication, what educational and behavioral methods were used to help him in the classroom? What had not happened in his education? And what kind of a society are we that allows children with disabilities to be placed in what are in essence cells with bars on the window and locks the door?
Share this Post
Related Posts
Comments (7)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email




















Yes, this annoys me so deeply.
There NEEDS to be regulations. Especially when it comes to places like JRD.
Posted by Shondolyn (Synesthesia) Gibson on 07/28/2009 @ 02:12PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Do you mean JRC? The place that shocks kids?
Posted by Erin Monk on 07/28/2009 @ 04:07PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Yes, I hate that place deeply. It's right here in my state too!
Posted by Shondolyn (Synesthesia) Gibson on 07/28/2009 @ 04:11PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
How absolutely evil. The ACLU wories about guantanamo, people who want to blow us up and chop our children' heads off, but noone worries about the Jonathans. Where is the ACLU and their civilr ights for our children?
Posted by Elise Butowsky on 07/28/2009 @ 02:48PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
The ACLU actually does work on cases and advocacy for people with disablities, and situations involving restraint and seclusion. In a strange way, by protecting the rights of detainees, they are also working to protect the integrity of our constitution. This integrity is necessary for us to protect the rights of children and adults with disabilities.
http://www.aclu.org/disability/gen/10648pub19990101.html
http://www.aclu.org/pdfs/humanrights/pta_article_corporal_punishment.pdf
http://www.aclu.org/prison/mentalhealth/28368res20070214.html
http://blog.aclu.org/2008/06/16/strip-searching-and-solitary-confinement-of-girls-at-texas-state-school/
http://www.aclu.org/womensrights/crimjustice/26850prs20060925.html
http://www.aclu.org/disability/mentallydisabled/index.html
Posted by Erin Monk on 07/28/2009 @ 08:07PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Hi Erin,
This is very nice to know about the ACLU. I would suggest then that they get a better PR person. Because having been involved in the disability community for almost 15 years I have never heard of them working in support of anyone like Jonathan. Nor have I read an amicus curae from them. Do you have any citations that I could read.The url above was mainly talking points. I would love to get their lawyers read on several issues, especially since my oldest is in college and is entering unchartered waters, so to speak.
Thanks.
Posted by Elise Butowsky on 07/29/2009 @ 04:54AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Appalling.
From the article,
"It allows these students to be educated in their communities," said Kim Hartsell, director of special education supports for the Georgia Department of Education. "It also is a cost-effective way of educating students with severe emotional disorders."
Also,
n Atlanta, Zimring [lawyer] represented the parents of a 10-year-old with autism who attended the North Metro psychoeducational school. Suspecting that their son, who can't speak, was receiving little instruction and was being mistreated, the parents sewed a tape recorder into his shirt one day last October. The boy came home with torn pants and marks from an apparent spanking. He also had a recording that confirmed his parents' fears.
At one point, an unidentified adult asked the boy, "Do you want a hit, a be-quiet hit?"
An adult told another student, "Sit down, stupid."
The classroom teacher could be heard on the tape - now part of a court record - discussing how to mix martinis, describing her boyfriend's penis [!], and ridiculing the boy for eating pizza out of the trash.
So much for allowance for "education", which by description doesn't seem particularly cost-effective or effective. Expulsion sounds like a step up from being in locked isolation for hours or days on end for throwing milk (consider the little girl in Wisconsin who died from prone restraint for blowing bubbles in her milk).
If the Georgia "education" system is going to abrogate the practices of the penal system, then it's time to be under at least the checks and balances of the penal and hospital systems, because clearly on an individual basis humanity seems to be out to lunch. One thing that I did not see in this story was whether there was any kind of school psychologist or other mental health or medical professional attached to this program and if so, what is the caseload and why was this allowed to continue? My understanding is that licensed professionals have codes of ethics that they are expected to adhere to.
So there was the brouhaha from the GAO report and the presentations to the House Committee of Education and Labor on these kinds of incidents... does anyone have knowledge whether there is substantive Federal legislation or regulation change in progress to improve practice and increase accountability, or was that just a media moment of concern and then back to business as usual?
Posted by Regina Claypool-Frey on 07/28/2009 @ 04:28PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.