Knowing About Autism Earlier & Earlier & Earlier?
Published July 01, 2009 @ 02:23PM PT

A review of 40 studies in the British Journal of Psychiatry examines over 50 prenatal factors for autism:
The factors associated with autism risk in the meta-analysis were advanced parental age at birth, maternal prenatal medication use, bleeding, gestational diabetes, being first born v. third or later, and having a mother born abroad. The factors with the strongest evidence against a role in autism risk included previous fetal loss and maternal hypertension, proteinuria, pre-eclampsia and swelling.
(For the record: I was 28 years old when Charlie was born and had pre-eclampsia.)
A BBC report on the study from yesterday is (rather misleadingly) headlined Problem pregnancy 'autism risk' and quotes Richard Mills of Research Autism:
"Age is a very interesting line of inquiry, but it is very hard to tease out one clear factor. It is like trying to complete a huge jigsaw puzzle - we still just don't know how all the pieces fit together."
Indeed---just as as many as 100 genes have been linked to autism, so it seems that multiple factors are being identified and studied, and not one of them has been, it seems, taken off the table. One reason for such studies is to be able to detect autism at earlier and earlier stages of a child's life and, too, before a child is born. Another BBC news story reports that a "universal embryo test" is "'very near'":
The test - which will cost around £2,500 - uses a technique called karyomapping which looks for the inheritance of sections of DNA or chromosomes.
Rather than knowing the exact gene mutation which is passed down the generations in an family affected by a condition such as cystic fibrosis, doctors can just look for the block of DNA containing a faulty gene.
At the moment genetic testing of embryos is generally limited to a few conditions.
But karyomapping could in theory be used to test for any one of the 15,000 genetic defects known about.
Using the same test doctors could also look at whether any chromosomes are missing or duplicated which suggests the embryo will not be viable.
Autism is specifically cited as one condition--a "'major [disease]" that the test could be used for, by looking for genetic causes that occur in 5% of cases.
While there is currently no prenatal test for autism, it is looking more and more inevitable. In view of the British Journal of Psychiatry study on the causes of autism and how various factors in pregnancy might affect this, autism is definitely going to be something that families expecting a baby hear about.
All the more reason to get the word out about older children and adults on the spectrum and how, while things are often not easy, it's a good life.
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
More Autism Than You'd Think; However......
-
O California!: What's going on with the autism rate in the Golden State?
-
Early Diagnosis and the Uses of Autism Research
Comments (2)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email



















I agree with you that a prenatal test is becoming more and more likely, and that the time to get proper supports in place for prenatal counseling is already here. I'd love to see groups like ASAN and the Autism Science Foundation already putting together packages to distribute to ob/gyn and doctor's offices in preparation for that day, or at the very least getting the word out that doctors can contact them. It was certainly an effective strategy in higher-order multiple birth world when little information was unavailable to prospective parents (and most doctors).
Posted by Jen Niebler on 07/02/2009 @ 02:30AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
A pre-natal test may be more likely. But will it be reliable? It is one thing to say that 5% of cases have this gene. But how many instances of "this gene" have the diagnosis?
And i agree 100% Having the diagnosis need not be a bad thing. As Ed Schneider says, it is possible to Live the good life with autism.
Posted by Mike Stanton on 07/03/2009 @ 03:55PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.