Autism

Musings on the DSM-V Revisions and "Severity"

Published May 27, 2009 @ 12:18AM PT

I've been pondering the changes to the DSM-V definition of Pervasive Developmental Disorders proposed by the DSM-V Neurodevelopmental Disorders Workgroup and discussed yesterday by Dora in her post Collapsing the Spectrum--And Expanding it Again: DSM Considerations. Dora particularly noted the workgroup's third recommendation, namely:

3) Symptom severity for ASD could be defined along a continuum that includes normal traits, subclinical symptoms and three different severity levels for the disorder.

As Dora wrote, might not "separations of severity within [the] spectrum be variable and inconsistent?" The"level" of "severity" in an individual may very well vary "across an individual's life span, depending on age, available support, and a huge number of other possible factors." The workgroup's report provides "one possible model" for a "continuum" of "symptom severity for ASD." And, for what it's worth, I can see precisely where my son is according to this particular model.

Charlie would be "moderately severe ASD" as he has "some social communication but interactions noticeably disturbed" and "frequent and interfering rituals, repetitive behaviors and fixated interests."

He can talk some and does so to express his wants and (just this past weekend) what he's thinking, sometimes; he has a number of "interfering rituals, repetitive behaviors and fixated interests," and (especially when he's tired or frustrated or strung out) these become much more apparent. But his "preoccupation" with these is not "constant" and, with a lot of patient efforts, Charlie has learned to put aside those "rituals" and "behaviors."

What makes it especially hard for Charlie right now is that his main "problem behavior"---which doesn't occur frequently (not every day)---is a tough one. When he gets really anxious, is really tired, is really uncertain about what is going on, there's aggression towards himself (head-banging) and others. Due to his size (and it predicted early on that Charlie'd be tall, as he's been in the 90th and up percentile for height since he was a baby), it takes a lot more effort on our part, and on Charlie's, to get all that anxiety under control, and especially when things get physical. And, because Charlie is also in the throes of adolescence, and because he's not able to work out his energy and feelings doing something like organized team sports, all that energy and all those feelings will out some way.

But Charlie is not engaging in all these "challenging" behaviors (sorry for all the behavior-speak; we've been very wrapped up in it of late) constantly. One new difficulty is that he's gotten very upset at times and under circumstances when he had heretofore been at ease: For instance, twice last week at school, he got very upset very quickly while doing a conversational program that he's been working on for a long time.

Again. regarding the notion of "severity": Jim and I do think that, without years of teaching, years of trying constantly to learn how Charlie learns and communicates, Charlie might be considered "most severe." Other families have told us about siblings who, they say, Charlie reminds them of and who were placed in an institution by the time they were 7 or 8. Looking back, 7 and 8 were years that Charlie started to have a lot more trouble at school and at home: Some of this was because we had yet to find the right educational setting, and some, we think, due to his getting older, being able to do more than he had been, but still a lot less than other children his age. That process of maturing and wanting to be independent, but still having a lot of needs and limitations---this has occurred all over again for Charlie now that he's an adolescent.

All this "severity" talk has been clanging in my and Jim's thoughts as our school district again has been floating around talk of "temporary residential placement." It does seem a bit ironic that we, who Charlie lives with (uh, we are his parents), have not expressed a single wish for this sort of placement---we just keeping saying, Charlie's our son and he lives with us. (It should be so obvious.) We're not asking for him not to live with us (of course not!) and, ok, sometimes I know it's hard to see the extent of issues when you are living inside of them, but Jim and I know we like our life with Charlie. We've managed to figure out how to learn and change ourselves to accommodate for his needs at each step of the way so far. This has been extra challenging lately as Charlie is fast gaining on Jim in size and strength but we're a long long way (really, I don't think we'll ever get there) to say we can't handle things anymore. Some moments are so very challenging but we know that we made that promise to Charlie and we know that it's a promise we will keep.

Below is one proposed model for a "continuum" of "symptom severity for ASD" from the DSM-V Workgroup's report.













































 



Social Communication



Fixated Interests and Repetitive Behaviors



Most severe ASD



Minimal or no social communication


 



Nearly constant, complete preoccupation, strongly resists interference with ritual



Moderately severe ASD



Some social communication but interactions noticeably disturbed


 



Frequent and interfering rituals, repetitive behaviors and fixated interests



Less severe ASD



Clear impairments in social communication.  Meets all diagnostic criteria including symptom severity greater than threshold



Occasional rituals, repetitive behaviors and fixated interests; some interference



    XXXXXXXXXXXX



 XXXXXXXXXXXXX



 XXXXXXXXXXXXX



Subclinical AS Symptoms



Has some symptoms from one or both domains but no significant interference or impairment. 


 



Odd mannerisms, some excessive preoccupations but distractible, may have ritualized behaviors but they don’t interfere with daily activities



 



 



 



Normal Variation



Socially isolated or “awkward”


 



Some ritualized behaviors and preoccupations but these are normal for developmental stage and cause no interference


Related Posts

Comments (8)

  1. Fw2 farmwifetwo

    We'd fall under "Moderately Severe ASD" for my 7yr old and Normal Variation for my 9yr old.

    Hopefully you'll get Charlie's behaviour under control. I've worked and worked and now maybe once every 3mths we have issues beyond the "normal" 9yr old behaviours, only a couple of years ago it was daily - headbanging being the most common. But unlike Charlie and my littlest he's fully verbal and understands consequences of negative behaviour. I have to admit to being spoiled having an easy going child with Severe Non-verbal PDD (current dx).... so I'm not complaining. He does wring his left hand which has caused some damage, but with sensory programming it's lessening too.

    S.

    Posted by Fw2 farmwifetwo on 05/27/2009 @ 05:27AM PT

  2. Katie miller

    They also need to modify the other diagnostic criteria. For example, taking out the bit about "lacking imagination", which we know to be completely false. Furthermore, how can science accurately measure the amount of imagining going on in a person's head? They can't. All they can do is record what evidence for imagination is communicated. If someone has difficulty communicating, it is more likely the will exert the energy to ask for something like food rather than elaborate on the inner workings of their mind. Secondly, almost all experts agree that sensory sensitivities are a key factor in ASD. I truely hope this is added to the diagnostic criteria as well.

    Posted by Katie miller on 05/27/2009 @ 07:42AM PT

  3. Kristina Chew

    And somehow the sensory aspects seem all wound up into Charlie's "behaviors"; so often I think he struggles to express what it is that is bothering him and then it gets to the point that he so to speak "explodes."

    Posted by Kristina Chew on 05/27/2009 @ 02:41PM PT

  4. Reply to thread
  5. emma brooks

    "...separations of severity within [the] spectrum be variable and inconsistent?...."
    I agree with Dora wrote, there are lots of variables.

    I've also found with Dimitri (who not autistic but is disabled) seizures have also played a major role in how well he is doing.

    The "sub-clinical AS symptoms" and particularly the "normal variation", are almost suggesting shy and socially akward, which I think its estimated at 1/4 of the population is to some degree shy. Hope that doesn't lead to less understanding and accomodations instead of more.

    Posted by emma brooks on 05/27/2009 @ 07:45AM PT

  6. Kristina Chew

    Once upon a time I was very shy and really awkward---used to start and sweat if anyone asked me a question in school. That went on until graduate school.


    Though I think "moderate to severe" describes Charlie, mixed in with this is this comment from his teacher (who brought up the residential thing again)---she noted in the same meeting that he has "pre-vocational skills." And that other kids in his class (who can read and have more academics than Charlie) don't have the pre-vocational skills. More variables----

    Posted by Kristina Chew on 05/27/2009 @ 02:46PM PT

  7. emma brooks

    I was (am) shy too, caused havoc for interviews etc.

    With the last 2 categories I just had a vision of someone saying "your just shy, you'll get over it" without understanding anything about autism - although I guess that happens now.

    On second glance there also seems a big divide, 3 categories using the word severe and 2 markedly different descriptions, not much of a continuum.

    Pre-vocational skills for Charlie sounds interesting!

    Posted by emma brooks on 05/28/2009 @ 03:17AM PT

  8. Reply to thread
  9. Three things doesn't make up much of a "continuum." If they insist on keeping to this static-levels-of-functioning model, they're going to need a lot more "levels," aren't they? Not everyone is going to fall square into one of those (and then there's the matter of variations over time, variations day to day, etc... doesn't EVERYBODY function better some days than others? People aren't static, why are the labels?) But even for overall average "functioning level" for a person, some people are going to be between the "moderate" and the "mild," etc. What then?

    Posted by Fleecy B. on 05/28/2009 @ 08:22AM PT

  10. Kristina Chew

    A prominent neuroscientist, Jane Costello, resigned from the DSM-V committee back in March:

     

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/17162466/Jane-Costello-Resignation-Letter-from-DSMV-Task-Force-to-Danny-Pine-March-27-2009

    Posted by Kristina Chew on 07/08/2009 @ 01:59PM PT

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Twitter Feed

Kristina Chew

Kristina is a Classics professor in Jersey City, New Jersey, a blogger (formerly at AutismVox), a translator (of Virgil), and an advocate every day for her son, Charlie.

Most Popular Autism Posts
close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action. If you already have an account click here.

  Cancel